The biggest part about the DMCA that annoys me is the liars

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:23 pm

Ziggles wrote:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=406310886200#!/group.php?v=wall&gid=406310886200

Group made and I have sent my invites out.....

Wow im Mad Evil or Very Mad

Not sure if im allowed to post the link for the FB group so sorry if im not Smile

Ok so the above sites have been reported to the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP)

Time will tell what they have to say about this stuff. For now we will just have to wait.

This thread has been slightly hijacked but thanks for reading.

Zig

Just join your group mate as djdezzie said you should be able to guess who i am

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:39 pm

Those websites are redonkulous , sick phuckers are those that view that shite

edit : and about miss goth christine ..... id say she got Pwned royally

never mess with internet peeps , we eat u for breakfast

edit 2 : -!- ISOHUNT RULEZ -!-

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:03 pm

+1 for Epic-ness

and I almost fell out of my chair at "maybe this thing"

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:47 pm

oneup wrote:

why does everyone has these huge annoying animated gifs in their signatures Shocked

if you're using firefox press the "Esc" button, it freezes the animation in the gifs

back on topic, i have not checked out the linked pages, nor do i intend to
"The biggest part of DMCA that annoys me is the Liars"
... i could not agree more
there are a ton of people out there that cling to a perception and hope that their facts are not checked
they make such a bold statement that invokes negative imagery that ones common sense is over-ridden with a response
... blind to reality

thanks for the heads up SS

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:30 pm

Its pretty disgusting someone would go this far (stoop this low) and use pedophilia as a scare tactic. Chritine Pilack go F**** yourselve.

SlayerTudd wrote:

you obviously didnt read what I sed

Now if you know what the hell is going on, then YOU can answer my questions

Said*

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 8:11 pm

Quite a sad state of affairs..

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 1:47 am

Ziggles wrote:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=406310886200#!/group.php?v=wall&gid=406310886200

Group made and I have sent my invites out.....

Wow im Mad Evil or Very Mad

Not sure if im allowed to post the link for the FB group so sorry if im not Smile

Ok so the above sites have been reported to the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP)

Time will tell what they have to say about this stuff. For now we will just have to wait.

This thread has been slightly hijacked but thanks for reading.

Zig

you are getting advertisement, Smile

http://blog.bitsnoop.com/2010/03/users-at-isohuntcom-are-taking-action.html

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 2:25 am

I am glad to see something I said had an impact for once.

At any rate, it would be really awesome if something positive came out of this whole mess, and from the rate the group on facebook is growing hopefully that is the case.

I think I may drop a line to our resident signature artist here to come up with a logo for the group. Which already seems poised to go after some other similar sites too.

Posted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 11:56 pm

already_dead wrote:

Ziggles wrote:

http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=406310886200#!/group.php?v=wall&gid=406310886200

Group made and I have sent my invites out.....

Wow im Mad Evil or Very Mad

Not sure if im allowed to post the link for the FB group so sorry if im not Smile

Ok so the above sites have been reported to the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP)

Time will tell what they have to say about this stuff. For now we will just have to wait.

This thread has been slightly hijacked but thanks for reading.

Zig

you are getting advertisement, Smile

http://blog.bitsnoop.com/2010/03/users-at-isohuntcom-are-taking-action.html

Wow thanks for that Very Happy

Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 12:02 am

Crooked_Ferret wrote:

I am glad to see something I said had an impact for once.

At any rate, it would be really awesome if something positive came out of this whole mess, and from the rate the group on facebook is growing hopefully that is the case.

I think I may drop a line to our resident signature artist here to come up with a logo for the group. Which already seems poised to go after some other similar sites too.

Ferret ...

That would be fantastic.

The group has taken a life of its own and we are inundated with emails showing support. We have also been asked to report 7 other suspect sites which we have done.

Sadly we have had some negative stuff with people suggesting we are in fact a Pedo ring trying to advertise sites. O well I have broad shoulders and I have nothing to hide.

We will be contacting UK & Australian media sometime this week and once we have found some trusted people in other countries, we will use them as spokesperson for that country.

Thanks again for everyone here that has shown support.

Zig`s

Posted: Sun Mar 14, 2010 6:35 pm

SlightAversion wrote:

seems like gothie girl takes herself waaaaaaaaay too seriously...

but then again, if gothies dont take themselves waaaaaaaay too seriously, they would just DIE of embarassment for how silly they really are...

they make me laugh...

"Allure of the Vampire: Our Sexual Attraction to the Undead"

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
(truncated)

Sorry to be off-off topic on this one, but after looking at said photos & considering SlightAversion's post, it left me thinking about something.

Is it just me, or are most goth folk on either one or the other end of the height/weight spectrum? Seems there's never much in the middle ground...

+1 for AWESOMENESS!
(Press my AWESOME button!)
http://redvsblue.com/archive/?sid=dynamic

Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 12:56 pm

We have received a reply from the Internet Watch Foundation. Its not good news really. Its OK though we kind of expected this. Now on to plan B so to speak.

Thank you for your report to the Internet Watch Foundation.

We have assessed the material specified in your report and not found any images of child sexual abuse.

The site you have reported contains child modelling content and whilst some of this material may be considered inappropriate it is not actionable under current thresholds.

We are therefore unable to take any further action on this occasion.

Thank you for your support and assistance in reporting this URL to us for assessment.

With best wishes,

SK
Internet Content Analyst
Internet Watch Foundation

I think these guys at the IWF must have shit in their eyes but thats just my opinion.

Rolling Eyes

Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:29 pm

they're taking it careful, as they should,
we're looking to"Censor" something from the internets
which can in turn be used as a foundation for further actions against similar situations
so moral outrage be damned
it is not going to be easy, the key role here is finding specific reason that justifies intervention and restriction while maintaining net-neutrality
otherwise floodgates may be opened for "other" outraged groups demanding censorship

i don't have much free time to lend, but will help where i can

Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 3:46 pm

Ziggles wrote:

We have assessed the material specified in your report and not found any images of child sexual abuse.

The site you have reported contains child modelling content and whilst some of this material may be considered inappropriate it is not actionable under current thresholds.

pretty much word for word what I got when I first tried reporting them.

Posted: Mon Mar 15, 2010 4:31 pm

Thanks for keeping isohunt up to date Ziggles so I guess it's on to plan B...anybody have one?

[EDIT] Would words like child indecency, vunerable, poor taste etc do anything?
Damn we need a good lawyer.