- You can use boolean operators (-, |, OR), wildcards (*, ?), and phrase search (") in your query
- For BitTorrent: Paste in a 40 characters info_hash, to search for that particular torrent and get all trackers for it
| |
| Author |
Message |
already_dead
Slack Mod

Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 8942
Location: Find me and you get free Buck Shot. (triple-aught, even)
Status: Offline
Reputation: 4185
|
The 20% increase in web browsing speed over SSD Just for putting your browser cache on one is enough of a reason for me.  |
_________________
+1 Rep
those that help...
Win 8 x64|780iFTW|Q9450@2.66Hz|8GBDDR2|GTX460|XaserVI
|
|
 |
cbilljones
VIP

Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 4170
Status: Offline
Reputation: 1186
|
| JamesHotwire wrote: |
| cbilljones wrote: |
| Sounds like minimal gains for an extremely high cost to me, ram may have come down in price, but its still way more expensive than SSD. So unless you get around 5x the speed of SSD this seems a waste to me. |
I got 24GB for $100 gskill ripjaws 1333mhz brand new, far as the speed improvement, it's more than 10x faster. Look at the numbers off to the side second to last collum on my benchmarks. Thats the drive benchmark. |
10x? im not so sure, what is your data transfer rate on the ramdisk? I cant see any specs in your screenshots as there is some big irrelevant number covering them  |
_________________
|
|
 |
JamesHotwire
VIP

Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 889
Location: Indiana
Status: Offline
Reputation: 419
|
SSD bench mark
RAMDisk bench mark
Now you got me thinking maybe my ssd drive is slower than average ssd, I dont know on that. It's a mini ssd out of a tablet I believe. Anyway I had to get a adapter to go from min pci to sata. Maybe I'm not getting the best transfer that way? All I know for sure is the bench mark shows the ramdrive to be alot faster. Now back to a comment I made about encoding, well it doesn't make as big improvement as I had hoped. Using convertx2dvd it knocked roughly 20 seconds on the conversion, with an average of 30 more fps. Ran the same file 2 times each way, best time was on ram at 5 minutes 37 seconds for a 1.3 GB file.
|
_________________
|
|
 |
cbilljones
VIP

Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 4170
Status: Offline
Reputation: 1186
|
Well your ssd speeds are definentlly slow, as i have WD black sata drives that do better. But the numbers are higher than i would have thought on the ram disk. But convertx would never see a benefit i dont think, you would need a bottleneck on your disk speed for this to have any real benefit in my opinion. So unless convertx is doing its job in around 45-60 seconds, ramdisk is no better than sata. |
_________________
|
|
 |
|
|
This site features search engines on metadata only. It is a service independent of the IRC and BitTorrent networks. Use at your own risk.
Powered by phpBB :: All times are GMT - 7 Hours
-ADVERTISEMENT-

|
VIP
We aren't opposed to you blocking our ads, but we'd appreciate your support of this free search engine by donating above.
VIP
membership is only $1/month, with perks like turning off all annoying ads. We dislike ads as much as you do!
 NEW 8 Years Anniversary Tee!
| |
This site features search engines on metadata only. It is a service independent of the IRC and BitTorrent networks. Use at your own risk.