Net Neutrality: say no to censorship

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 4:12 pm

Now I have been here for a while and an avid reader, And to add a huge supporter of all of the blogging done here, I started as a person who had all of there possesions stolen on many occasions 1st 330 full length paid for albums and a broken car window, I spent the next year or two trying to piece back together this massive collection. Never have been able to replace the 3 disc Nirvana Outsesticide Import. Upon reaching about 225 new cd's I was robbed again. I said after that I wouldn't buy another cd, Years later Me my wife were robbed yet again, destroying my car, a 1600 dollar system, My kids Ipods, and all the power tools in our outdoor shed. So now being an adult, We filed against the ins. company, only to be turned down because it was outdoors, and the Car insurance companies said that we had to have additional coverage to have it covered that of course we did not have. So yet again out of Thousands of dollars, A good friend brought me here some time ago, Where I began to read more and more about users who have paid for all they download, at one point in time, The more I read the more I discovered how they almost change the wording of the written laws to cover profit loss and nothing more,.. I will continue to read and re-blog but to those who started this , IH , I personally applaud your efforts and I support your theories and opinions. Thank-you to IH and hope to read a response to this I will gladly convey more of my opinion..

Posted: Wed Mar 19, 2008 5:24 pm

Razor512 wrote:

that sucks, what needs to be done is a movement kinda like the one anonymous is doing that will make the world better understand this issue and take action

I so agree

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2008 7:36 am

I am against cencorship of the internet (TV and radio on the other hand, you sometimes don't really know what you're going to see when you turn it on, so I understand that), however, there should be and most of the time are clear warnings as to what kind of website or film you're going to view, for the people who wouldn't want to view certain things.

Posted: Thu Mar 27, 2008 8:41 am

How can an ISP say what is right or wrong for a customer to view?

Posted: Wed Apr 02, 2008 10:28 am

Okay. The internet has ran so far as a open market where anonymous individuals come together in mutual agreement with self-consent and exchange information.

It's worked fine. So a few parents bought their little 10 year old daughters their own computer and let them on the internet and they get in trouble. That's the parent's fault . Children in my opinion shouldn't be allowed to wander free on the internet, if the parent's don't like what they can possibly be exposed to.

There are things on the internet I'd hate my kids to be exposed to, and THAT'S saying something, as I'm as open-minded as they come.

All sites should be public domain, I mean f*** it's the last place people have to go in America to save themselves from being enveloped in a horror from some George Orwell-like world. In real life, we have freedom of speech zones, where you are not allowed to talk out against the government in public.

We, as americans, are like cattle to our government as it is, with them monitoring phone calls and internet usage. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if I get arrested for writing this. I hate it with a passion, so many rules against being human. The American culture is a backwards coprophagic, feeding off the shit the media feeds them and conforming to the rules enforced that TOTALLY RAPE THE US CONSTITUTION.

With the coming of web censorship, we loose the last bit of humanity, and start down the primordial evolution into a slave race, where a few elitists control every aspect of our life directly; we as human beings will no longer be able to talk in the way I am now, without fear of apprehension by a corrupt buerocracy that wants to keep things blatantly and painstakingly simple, and to a grid.

SAY NO TO NET CENSORSHIP.

SAY YES TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND NET NEUTRALITY.

Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 6:12 pm

raceman94 wrote:

It's sad isn't it? I'm 100% for net neutrality!

I couldn't agree more.

------------

1337Cyndic@ wrote:

Okay. The internet has ran so far as a open market where anonymous individuals come together in mutual agreement with self-consent and exchange information.

It's worked fine. So a few parents bought their little 10 year old daughters their own computer and let them on the internet and they get in trouble. That's the parent's fault . Children in my opinion shouldn't be allowed to wander free on the internet, if the parent's don't like what they can possibly be exposed to.

There are things on the internet I'd hate my kids to be exposed to, and THAT'S saying something, as I'm as open-minded as they come.

All sites should be public domain, I mean f*** it's the last place people have to go in America to save themselves from being enveloped in a horror from some George Orwell-like world. In real life, we have freedom of speech zones, where you are not allowed to talk out against the government in public.

We, as americans, are like cattle to our government as it is, with them monitoring phone calls and internet usage. Hell, I wouldn't be surprised if I get arrested for writing this. I hate it with a passion, so many rules against being human. The American culture is a backwards coprophagic, feeding off the shit the media feeds them and conforming to the rules enforced that TOTALLY RAPE THE US CONSTITUTION.

With the coming of web censorship, we loose the last bit of humanity, and start down the primordial evolution into a slave race, where a few elitists control every aspect of our life directly; we as human beings will no longer be able to talk in the way I am now, without fear of apprehension by a corrupt buerocracy that wants to keep things blatantly and painstakingly simple, and to a grid.

SAY NO TO NET CENSORSHIP.

SAY YES TO FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND NET NEUTRALITY.

Wow! Well put.

Posted: Fri Apr 04, 2008 11:44 pm

Thanks, Austincd27, glad to hear feedback Smile

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:52 pm

Quote:

Virgin Media CEO attacks net neutrality

Virgin Media CEO Neil Berkett has attacked the principle of net neutrality, whereby internet service providers do not interfere with or degrade the speed at which content is delivered from websites to consumers, branding it as "bollocks".

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/digitaltv/a93556/virgin-media-ceo-attacks-net-neutrality.html

http://digg.com/tech_news/Virgin_Media_CEO_attacks_net_neutrality

Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:58 pm

OG wrote:

Quote:

Virgin Media CEO attacks net neutrality

Virgin Media CEO Neil Berkett has attacked the principle of net neutrality, whereby internet service providers do not interfere with or degrade the speed at which content is delivered from websites to consumers, branding it as "bollocks".

http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/digitaltv/a93556/virgin-media-ceo-attacks-net-neutrality.html

http://digg.com/tech_news/Virgin_Media_CEO_attacks_net_neutrality

Yay more contemporary corporate mentality! Charge more so the rich are the only ones who get good service!

Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:54 pm

this is latest on net neutrality in the states ?? P4P ?? see this story http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20080410-big-isps-push-p4p-as-substitute-for-fcc-regulation.html

Posted: Thu Apr 17, 2008 3:21 pm

Down with nutraility

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 11:18 am

raceman94 wrote:

It's sad isn't it? I'm 100% for net neutrality!

freedom to share!!! riches to the poor

Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 5:04 pm

Some more news on the net neutrality front.

Posted: Wed Apr 23, 2008 8:38 pm

Thats terrible. Im all for 100% net neutrality.

Posted: Thu Apr 24, 2008 8:21 pm

Net neutrality is something that really should be in effect. Think of all the possibilities that could exist if everyone wasn't so tight on rules and following every line down to the period. New ways to share files, and send information quickly without a single site being overrun by people trying to download them as quick as possible, which then leads to the site going down, bandwidth issues, etc.

Evil or Very Mad