Who do you think will win? Ironman VS Batman

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 4:19 pm

Hmmm...

Ironman VS Batman

The above superheroes do not have gifted abilities like super strength (Superman), or can stick on the wall (Spider Man) or anything else like such...

Ironman and Batman only have only their own unusual thinking abilities like super geniuses (i mean they are portrayed just like a human being but with very high IQ...) and of course loads of cash to support their habit, ambitions and goals...

Just wondering, if these two super heroes were real and happened to fight each other, who do you think will win? and why? and if you have any other super hero that has the same abilities that you think will best defeat either one of these two mentioned?

Question

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Considering the technical and tactical advantages, Tony Stark would murder Bruce Wayne.

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 9:32 pm

Bruce Wayne has a highly disciplined and trained mind, maybe a little intuitive. Whereas Tony Stark is a full blown genius level intellect.

Batman would have no answer to Iron Man's superiority, except maybe a crate of exceptional, 20 year old, single malt Whiskey.

Hey! Someone has explored this issue already.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlLeCu63HCA
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=H7O17yGJ6-0&feature=related
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=NW6N2icB88s&feature=related
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=nY5jVtn6eGA&feature=related

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:14 pm

Lets see, a suit of armor which is the prelude to the first marine jump suit battle armor versus a utility belt

I think I'm going with the battle armor, Iron Man for the win

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 11:53 pm

Illinga wrote:

Bruce Wayne has a highly disciplined and trained mind, maybe a little intuitive. Whereas Tony Stark is a full blown genius level intellect.

Batman would have no answer to Iron Man's superiority, except maybe a crate of exceptional, 20 year old, single malt Whiskey.

Hey! Someone has explored this issue already.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NlLeCu63HCA
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=H7O17yGJ6-0&feature=related
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=NW6N2icB88s&feature=related
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=cDxgNjMTPIs
http://au.youtube.com/watch?v=nY5jVtn6eGA&feature=related

I do apologize if this issue has been explored already but i think the issue was " Spiderman and Superman" and both have inherent super strength abilities and not the same as the two in this case...

Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:23 pm

LOL

No, I wasn't saying that the question had been explored in the Isohunt Forums before (Although I understand why you would think that, you do start more than your fair share of redundant polls Wink

).

I was merely directing attention to some witty and amusing YouTube vids that had examined the topic from the point of view of the character's respective recent release films.

I love this topic and am keen to hear people's opinions.

When I raised this question with my colleagues it stimulated heated debate (Thank God no one had Repulsor Rays or Batarangs, they would have used them if they could!).

I'm hoping it will similarly arouse the members of Isohunt to thoughtful response.

Iron Man for the WIN!

Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 6:13 pm

nuh uh batman can just get out his screw driver and take iron man to bits Laughing

Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 3:59 pm

Quote:

nuh uh batman can just get out his screw driver and take iron man to bits

Maybe, The Batman of 35 years ago vs the Iron Man of 35 years ago, Iron Man's suit did used to give a huge electric jolt to any would be invaders. This would function whether Tony Stark was conscious (or sober!) or not. The shock seemed to defy the laws of physics, but The Batman of that era seemed to be able to transcend certain physical principles as well.

Tony Stark's new suits may not be as 'invincible' as his title may suggest, but they are impenetrable. This is to prevent industrial espionage as much as anything, Mr Stark doesn't want anyone stealing his technology or having it fall into the wrong hands. Batman would have no answer to this aspect of the suit. (The "Impenetrable Iron Man", now there's a thought. Although, one wonders whether it would cause a new breed of 'super' sex fiends to rise to the challenge.)

BTW:
Tony Stark is a bit of a Fascist as well as being a high level government operative. Batman wouldn't just lose the fight he would also become an enemy of the state.

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 1:06 am

illinga it was a joke Laughing

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:06 am

Tifa wrote:

illinga it was a joke Laughing

@Tifa
You are so right, I have got to get myself a life. Embarassed

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:09 am

noo i didnt mean that

off topic but has anyone elsenoticed the smileys have no nose Shocked

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:17 pm

ok fully geared ironman of course...
but seriously batman beats people to death with his own hands and has trained his mind and body to extreme levels
whereas ironman relies on his suit, a brilliant mind, and alcohol
so ironman wins again as long as he has his suit

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:33 pm

I think Batman's wit would prevail, I mean you can say the same thing and compare Batman to Superman -which if you saw the animated Batman and Superman movie you'll know Batman just gathered some kryptonite...

It seems like when comparing superheroes to batman we tend to drop his title as batman and immediately collect that he is Bruce Wayne, mortal human. Perhaps Tony's suit has made him quite the invincible, yet without the suit he's not much of a martial artist, master of pain, forensic scientist, crime genius and the rest of whatever Batman is inclined with. So it's all under the circumstances. You can't match Batman and Iron Man in the air -even though I'm sure Bruce has some 5 trillion dollar gadget or jetsuit, I think it comes down to weighing them out all around. Strength, wit, tact, blah blah blah.

The only reason why I won't vote is because of Pepper Pots. Can't go against something like that :p

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:53 pm

Tyler Read wrote:

I think Batman's wit would prevail, I mean you can say the same thing and compare Batman to Superman -which if you saw the animated Batman and Superman movie you'll know Batman just gathered some kryptonite...

It seems like when comparing superheroes to batman we tend to drop his title as batman and immediately collect that he is Bruce Wayne, mortal human. Perhaps Tony's suit has made him quite the invincible, yet without the suit he's not much of a martial artist, master of pain, forensic scientist, crime genius and the rest of whatever Batman is inclined with. So it's all under the circumstances. You can't match Batman and Iron Man in the air -even though I'm sure Bruce has some 5 trillion dollar gadget or jetsuit, I think it comes down to weighing them out all around. Strength, wit, tact, blah blah blah.

The only reason why I won't vote is because of Pepper Pots. Can't go against something like that :p

+1rep for you, i actually voted for Batman for these very reasons (Gothams Sherlock Holmes)
the first thing that popped into my mind was Bruce/Batman wouldn't fight Ironman - just wait for Tony to emerge and confront him
am now off to go Google pepper pots EDIT O.I.C. yeah
btw isn't this Marvel V D.C.?

Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 10:18 pm

I'm not sure we're talking about a battle where there will be time for wits to come into play. The two of them in a open field, ironman would kill batman in a heartbeat.
I'm trying to figure out how anyone thinks batman would pin ironman down in the first place to do all this crap to him.