| Author |
Message |
ikkuh_2
Partially Experienced Newbie (tm)
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 35
Status: Offline
Reputation: 1
|
Keep up the good work  |
|
|
 |
prinilen
I'm new be nice to me PLZ!
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 6
Status: Offline
Reputation: 1
|
Nice
Good post.
Good decision. |
|
|
 |
ctriou
I'm new be nice to me PLZ!
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 4
Status: Offline
Reputation: 1
|
|
 |
luckyskua
I'm new be nice to me PLZ!
Joined: 02 Dec 2009
Posts: 1
Status: Offline
Reputation: 2
|
The fact that current copyright material can be distributed is clearly a matter that the courts will find fault with. I have not seen any mention made of information that is no longer available for retail. So I cannot buy a Marilyn Monroe film but can download it from a Torrent website. I don't see this as infringement of copyright because it is not for sale and I think that an extension of the Freedom of Information Act is applicable here for discontinued songs, films and other information. |
|
|
 |
hawkyrich75
isoHunt Supporter
Joined: 06 Dec 2009
Posts: 16
Location: Bristol, Uk
Status: Offline
Reputation: 14
|
| Vizzible wrote: |
Good luck with the court case. If you need help...You got about 500,000 members here for ya  |
Regarding your ongoing case with the CRIA. I just think that it is another case of an organisation misinterpreting the views of its clients, namely the artistes who have, until recently, been forced into making deals with Companies who had the financial clout to act as representative and sole distribution channel that had access to resources that made it easy to earn a respectable, nay substantial, income, whilst doing something that they obviously love doing. The recent Christmas number 1, here in the UK (A rerelease of Rage Against the Machine 1992 song, Killing in the name) is an example of the attitude of people who now have a simple method of creating critical masses of people. This is what the Record companies & industry associations are up against. We should not be disheartened to hear that the stale Associations are using legal challenges to try & stifle progress which benefits their customers. Rather we should be glad that they are behind the times & therefore they have come out with the only thing they have ever had much of: money. This is a last desparate act of theirs to try & put a brake on the unstoppable change that the internet has caused. In the introduction to the book Open Sources (Oreilly, 1999) Chris DiBona states that the internet has lowered the accessibility bar for new entrants to the market to a much lower level. This is certainly the case for new musicians and other types of artists. It gives them immediate access to a worldwide audience without them needing to set up complex contracts with companies. Instead it allows them to directly distribute to their potential customers. We have already seen the impact that services such as itunes has had on the music industry. It is therefore only a matter of time before that same industry realises that potential benefit. A Number of well-known content-based providers already provide services via bittorrent and other P2P protocols and these should be applauded for realising that market opportunity. No one association is ever going to force a site to go offline just because it dosent fit with their clients business model. That model should instead be modified to take advantage of the opportunity.
I Will certainly make a donation for this most worthy of causes. |
|
|
 |
lorenetengoff
I'm new be nice to me PLZ!
Joined: 31 Aug 2010
Posts: 1
Status: Offline
Reputation: 1
|
Law and order are for our safety and security so they are supposed to be respected and followed. |
|
|
 |
schlomo72
Elite Spammer

Joined: 20 Aug 2008
Posts: 11909
Location: dumping out the crumb tray
Status: Hidden
Reputation: 3754
|
| lorenetengoff wrote: |
| Law and order are for our safety and security so they are supposed to be respected and followed. |
whats that got to do with anything relating to this thread? |
_________________
|
|
 |
RAV3R
VIP

Joined: 05 Sep 2009
Posts: 1501
Location: PeAk DiStRiCt - IsOhUnTeR
Status: Hidden
Reputation: 809
|
| schlomo72 wrote: |
| lorenetengoff wrote: |
| Law and order are for our safety and security so they are supposed to be respected and followed. |
whats that got to do with anything relating to this thread? |
His comment was straight out of Leftfield schlomo!!!! Keep up the good work Isohunt  |
_________________
|
|
 |
NlCK
isoHunt Supporter

Joined: 02 Oct 2009
Posts: 670
Status: Offline
Reputation: 422
|
| lorenetengoff wrote: |
| Law and order are for our safety and security so they are supposed to be respected and followed. |
Good to see you're on our side. That's exactly why IH is suing. The current media companies have been abusing the law and manipulating the government for too long. You've opened my eyes. How can we pride ourselves in upholding malicious laws that were not made for our safety nor security?
|
|
|
 |
pacino23
Retired Mod

Joined: 27 Mar 2009
Posts: 10601
Location: In the darkness, waiting.....
Status: Hidden
Reputation: 3177
|
| lorenetengoff wrote: |
| Law and order are for our safety and security so they are supposed to be respected and followed. |
False. You don't blindly respect something just because its law, that's called been a sheep and a brown nose. In the end its attitudes such as that which validate the bullying and propaganda, in effect making things worse.
Was the law protecting and serving when the police beat Rodney King to a pulp, and so many others?
Is the law looking after you security when they won't deport terrorists due to human rights commitments?
Is the government taking your money and blindly funding a MPAA/CRIA led smear campaign that would be better spent on health care and other things? Why yes sir it is.
Nice troll, but you fail. |
_________________
Stupid PMs and emails will be ignored and deleted.. |
|
 |
apexcore
I'm new be nice to me PLZ!
Joined: 11 Jun 2010
Posts: 9
Status: Offline
Reputation: -127
|
Any news on this lawsuit? What the first trial date? |
|
|
 |
johnno23
Mcmoderator

Joined: 16 Apr 2007
Posts: 5922
Location: shanghai.
Status: Hidden
Reputation: 2600
|
IH addict that I am I decided to read every post and even follow the links from IH's first post on this thread.
1st off the latest post on the CMCC is from June 10 this year talks back at how multinationals are ahem protecting rights of canadian Artists.
However the latest post does offer many names of canadian artists supporting the CMCC who do not require multinationals to do their work for them.
| Quote: |
| Until recently, a group of multinational record labels has done most of the talking about what Canadian artists need out of copyright and cultural policy. These legislative proposals facilitate lawsuits against fans and increase the labels’ control over the enjoyment of music. These proposals have the labels’ interests at heart, not artists’ interests, not fans’ interests, and certainly not Canada’s interests. |
It is sad that it takes a serious injustice to actually get people to unite under any type of dialogue for reform that is truly beneficial and fair to all. Here a quote of old news but relevant news
| Quote: |
For immediate release: MONTREAL, October 22, 2007
The Canadian Music Creators Coalition (CMCC) renewed its calls for the Canadian government to ensure a made-in-Canada response to copyright reform. This call comes in the wake of the landmark judgment October 4 against Jammie Thomas, the single mother of two from Brainerd, MN who was hit with a penalty of $222,000 US for downloading 24 songs (approximately 90 minutes of music with a retail value of less than $25) and the Federal Government’s addition of “copyright reform” to its list of priorities in last week’s throne speech. |
Anyway, onto something else. The bit torrent tech is not just media files but also almost any open source and freeware or updates are to be found as torrents and this is where the P2P community excels.
At isohunt if I want to find something I find it and make a choice to download or search further.
These days I use the P2P community far more as I am sick and tired of these interent sites that are legal but do nothing but spam and redirect a simple search fo an open source or freeware app. They make money out of manipulation of something someone offered for free.
A simple example is the open source Audacity.
I as a Mac user have always loved this little app and recently discovered that i had forgotten to copy to my new Mac before selling the old one.
I googled it and found the app but everytime I hit the link I would be redirected to other sites advertising alternative software and tool bars etc etc etc.....I finally looked it up in the IH search engine and downloaded in a few moments. I was so irritated I decided to go back to the Google search result pages and finally tracked down the correct link for the download in small type and lost amongst the shit for sale.
IH as a search engine has proven to be a suitable alternative to referrals to sites that offer freeware but do nothing but link to sites paid for by advertisers. These people are the true scum as they make a profit out of exploitation of freeware and opensource. IH does not.
IH when used for searching links you direct to the file without all the fanfare and wasted space craving for your attention.
To force a shut down would in fact not help the copyright holders but would only promote those that leech off other peoples work via search results that actually want you to ignore your initial search and take what they have as alternative offers.
Not a rant but a simple truth. |
_________________
How can I change the world if I can't even change myself ? FAITHLESS |
|
 |
|
|
This site features search engines on metadata only. It is a service independent of the IRC and BitTorrent networks. Use at your own risk.
Powered by phpBB :: All times are GMT - 7 Hours
-ADVERTISEMENT-
 15% discount! Code "isohunt15"
|
VIP
We aren't opposed to you blocking our ads, but we'd appreciate your support of this free search engine by donating above.
VIP
membership is only $1/month, with perks like turning off all annoying ads. We dislike ads as much as you do!

|