Settings & History
  • You can use boolean operators (-, |, OR), wildcards (*, ?), and phrase search (") in your query
  • For BitTorrent: Paste in a 40 characters info_hash, to search for that particular torrent and get all trackers for it
Browse|Add this search and API to your site



<< Post  Letter from Warner!!   ::   How about HR.25? The Fair Tax  Post >>

Poll
What is your favorite philosophical school of thought?
Skepticism
12%
 12%  [ 9 ]
Realism
23%
 23%  [ 17 ]
Nominalism
0%
 0%  [ 0 ]
Rationalism
12%
 12%  [ 9 ]
Empiricism
4%
 4%  [ 3 ]
Existentialism
18%
 18%  [ 13 ]
Liberalism
6%
 6%  [ 5 ]
Pragmatism
5%
 5%  [ 4 ]
Moral philosophy
16%
 16%  [ 12 ]
Total Votes : 72


Author Message
weirdobeardo

VIP


Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 1636
Location: Philly

Status: Offline
Reputation: 117

Post Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:58 am Reply with quote   Back to top    

What is your favorite school of thought or philosopher?

Mine would be existentialism. I really enjoy the philosophies of Satre and Kiekegaard concerning freedom, individuality, and absurdism (the idea that the world is ultimately meaningless until we apply meaning to it).

Edit: I probably should explain what the schools of thought are.

Skepticism- the idea that knowledge is ultimately uncertain.
Realism- abstract and universal terms have real existence
Nominalism- abstract and universal terms are only words
Rationalism- reason is the basis for knowledge
Empiricism- experience is the basis for knowledge
Idealism- nothing can be known outside of the mind
Pragmatism- considers the practical consequences of truth
Existentialism- philosophical thinking begins with the human being
Liberalism- concerns individual liberty and equality
Moral philosophy- self explanatory and embodies many smaller schools of thought. Kant is a major proponent in moral philosophy.


Last edited by weirdobeardo on Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:36 pm; edited 1 time in total
View user's profile  Send private message      AIM Address      
trollster

Old Man River Mod


Joined: 06 Jan 2008
Posts: 16365
Location: I live here

Status: Offline
Reputation: 3200

Post Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:10 am Reply with quote   Back to top    

Skepticism

2 reasons, 1 i am a skeptic by nature and 2 i have nfi what the other ones are

_________________
DILLIGAF
View user's profile  Send private message  Send e-mail          
CrazyMcCool

isoHunt Supporter


Joined: 05 Aug 2008
Posts: 2700
Location: Israel

Status: Offline
Reputation: 574

Post Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 6:33 am Reply with quote   Back to top    

moral and realism

basically everything Laughing

_________________
Image Treat everyone with politeness, even those who are rude to you - not because they are nice, but because you are nice.
View user's profile  Send private message    Visit poster's website        
Omega50

I Byte!!


Joined: 09 Nov 2005
Posts: 10365
Location: Sitting here when I should be asleep!

Status: Hidden
Reputation: 3733

Post Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 6:36 am Reply with quote   Back to top    

I am into Humanism, but seeing as you didn't give me that option, I went for Realism.

Quote:
Humanism is a broad category of ethical philosophies that affirm the dignity and worth of all people, based on the ability to determine right and wrong by appealing to universal human qualities, particularly rationality, without resorting to the supernatural or alleged divine authority from religious texts.

_________________
Some mistakes are too much fun to only make once.
View user's profile  Send private message    Visit poster's website        
Cheapshot

Warnings : 1

isoHunt Addict


Joined: 04 Jan 2009
Posts: 645
Location: Florida

Status: Hidden
Reputation: 51

Post Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 7:03 am Reply with quote   Back to top    

I consider myself a peripheral visionary...

I can see the path ahead, but just way off to the side.

No really...

My Father was a Philosopher... problem was he had Dyslexia... So he spent most of his life wondering if there really was a DOG.

_________________
Image
View user's profile  Send private message            
P I M P

isoHunt Netizen


Joined: 07 Feb 2009
Posts: 75
Location: Conway, SC

Status: Hidden
Reputation: 5

Post Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 10:28 am Reply with quote   Back to top    

Oh Ma Gooodness!!!!!!!
What kind of losophies are they? I missed "phi" prefix it.
I have only one philosophy

Half of life is f**kin up the other half is dealing with it.
View user's profile  Send private message            
weirdobeardo

VIP


Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 1636
Location: Philly

Status: Offline
Reputation: 117

Post Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:52 pm Reply with quote   Back to top    

Omega50 wrote:
I am into Humanism, but seeing as you didn't give me that option, I went for Realism.

Quote:
Humanism is a broad category of ethical philosophies that affirm the dignity and worth of all people, based on the ability to determine right and wrong by appealing to universal human qualities, particularly rationality, without resorting to the supernatural or alleged divine authority from religious texts.

That would fall under moral philosophy. Kant covered this subject pretty extensively with Metaphysics of Morals.
View user's profile  Send private message      AIM Address      
altezon

Currently banned

isoHunt Supporter


Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 57

Status: Offline
Reputation: 3

Post Posted: Tue Mar 03, 2009 6:21 pm Reply with quote   Back to top    

there's some overlap here...i'm pretty sure real knowledge comes from experience...skepticism can mean keeping an open mind...abstractions are real in the sense that an answer exists for any question that makes sense, regardless of whether anyone can find out what it is...and individual liberty allows me to think such thoughts instead of when they will be coming to take me away Image
View user's profile  Send private message            
ggg_zk

Partially Experienced Newbie (tm)


Joined: 23 Dec 2008
Posts: 14
Location: La Prairie, Quebec

Status: Offline
Reputation: 4

Post Posted: Fri Mar 06, 2009 6:20 am Reply with quote   Back to top    

I have also liked Sartre's ideas on existentialism quite a bit. Other than that, I like Kant's idea of duty ethics. In real life, I am probably a lot more inclined to pragmatism, and am sometimes willing to bend the rules, even though this might seem in conflict with Kant.
View user's profile  Send private message            
altezon

Currently banned

isoHunt Supporter


Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 57

Status: Offline
Reputation: 3

Post Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:13 am Reply with quote   Back to top    

ggg_zk wrote:
I have also liked Sartre's ideas on existentialism quite a bit. Other than that, I like Kant's idea of duty ethics. In real life, I am probably a lot more inclined to pragmatism, and am sometimes willing to bend the rules, even though this might seem in conflict with Kant.

What do you like about Satre's ideas on existentialism and Kant's idea of duty ethics? Image
View user's profile  Send private message            
iamnephilim

Comment Mod


Joined: 03 Mar 2009
Posts: 8932
Location: Sandy Bridge

Status: Hidden
Reputation: 3359

Post Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 1:29 pm Reply with quote   Back to top    

half a glass.i never thought of it being half full or half empty.since i have to deal with whatever is in the glass i dump or drink it and do the next thing.
View user's profile  Send private message            
weirdobeardo

VIP


Joined: 28 Jan 2009
Posts: 1636
Location: Philly

Status: Offline
Reputation: 117

Post Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 4:16 pm Reply with quote   Back to top    

altezon wrote:
ggg_zk wrote:
I have also liked Sartre's ideas on existentialism quite a bit. Other than that, I like Kant's idea of duty ethics. In real life, I am probably a lot more inclined to pragmatism, and am sometimes willing to bend the rules, even though this might seem in conflict with Kant.

What do you like about Satre's ideas on existentialism and Kant's idea of duty ethics? Image

You're just trying to boost your post count by spamming.

Kant is my favorite basis for morality. The categorical imperative is something that we all live by whether we realize it or not. What rules of pragmatism would be bent and how is this conflicting with Kant? I see no problems. As long as people are seen as an end and not a means, Kant's philosophies are upheld.
View user's profile  Send private message      AIM Address      
altezon

Currently banned

isoHunt Supporter


Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 57

Status: Offline
Reputation: 3

Post Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 7:08 pm Reply with quote   Back to top    

weirdobeardo wrote:

You're just trying to boost your post count by spamming.
Kant is my favorite basis for morality. The categorical imperative is something that we all live by whether we realize it or not. What rules of pragmatism would be bent and how is this conflicting with Kant? I see no problems. As long as people are seen as an end and not a means, Kant's philosophies are upheld.

If you think I'm spamming, why the dissertation? I wasn't asking you anyway. Image


iamnephilim wrote:
half a glass.i never thought of it being half full or half empty.since i have to deal with whatever is in the glass i dump or drink it and do the next thing.

don't get hung up on what's fair...this is a skill, unless you're a lawyer Smile
View user's profile  Send private message            
iamnephilim

Comment Mod


Joined: 03 Mar 2009
Posts: 8932
Location: Sandy Bridge

Status: Hidden
Reputation: 3359

Post Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 8:52 pm Reply with quote   Back to top    

you kinda lost me i live in the real world where i have to see things as the really are (half a glass)without coloring it half full or half empty.not sure what you mean about unfair.realism as i was taught was seeing a thing for what it is.
View user's profile  Send private message            
Crooked_Ferret

VIP


Joined: 24 Feb 2008
Posts: 11121
Location: Da Interwebz

Status: Hidden
Reputation: 2180

Post Posted: Sat Mar 07, 2009 9:02 pm Reply with quote   Back to top    

altezon wrote:
...this is a skill, unless you're a lawyer Smile



what exactly is a skill?

Somehow you seem to think you're on the winning end of a debate you've offered nothing but one line troll comments too.

_________________
There is no society in recorded history that ever suffered because its people became too reasonable.
View user's profile  Send private message    Visit poster's website        
Display posts from previous:       

<< Post  Letter from Warner!!   ::   How about HR.25? The Fair Tax  Post >>

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

This site features search engines on metadata only. It is a service independent of the IRC and BitTorrent networks. Use at your own risk.


Powered by phpBB :: All times are GMT - 7 Hours



-ADVERTISEMENT-
useNext - Usenet binary client

VIP

membership is only $1/month, with perks like turning off all annoying ads. We dislike ads as much as you do!

Our 2nd contest winning t-shirt design! You know you want it!
NEW 8 Years Anniversary Tee!



Random Poll
Did you find this FAQ helpful?
Yes
No (post meaningful question / comment below)

New Posts

Friends
TorrentBox
Podtropolis

TorrentFreak
Torrents.to

FAC, CMCC
Defend Fair Use
Neutrality.ca

This site features search engines on metadata only. It is a service independent of the IRC and BitTorrent networks. Use at your own risk.
Canadian Coalition for Electronic Rights - CCER.CA   Lighttpd   Get Firefox   FF Plugins, Toolbar & Widgets

Page generation: 2.02s (1% in 12 SQLs) on b04, loadavg: 2.47       © isoHunt Inc. | Privacy & Copyright Policies